Consultants' Advisory Home Page Consultants' Advisory Home Page Reports Archive Register(Free) for the Online or Printed version of Consultants' Advisory

Business & software reviews
visit evaluationcentre.com

The Evaluation Centre's aim is to be the No.1 Software and technology assistant to decision makers with their IT requirements. Providing detailed Vendor reports, White papers, Case studies and Best practice guidelines

   

Home > 2002 > Project Management & Professional Services Automation (August) > Summary

You are not signed in to view the full issue > Sign In

Summary of Reports


 Asta Development

 Changepoint

 Hewlett-Packard

 Lawson

 Microsoft

 Mindjet

 OpenAccounts

 QualityTime Software

 Tx3 Solutions



Management Briefings



 Market Overview | Part 2 | Part 3

 Expert Opinion: Clive Burrows of Ovum

 Round Table | Part 2 | Part 3

 Implementation Issues: Mike Hesketh, Corporate Chameleon | Part 2

 Management Issues: Gerry Dodd, Project Management Institute and PMProfessional Learning

 Knowledge Management: Julian Curry, Visual Team | Part 2

 Market Requirements: C3 Consulting’s George Lawrie | Part 2

 Technology Choice: Book author Simon Wallace | Part 2

 User Experiences: Dennis Howlett, Webster Buchannan | Part 2

 Market News | Part 2

Issue Summary

Project Management & PSA (August 2002) Summary

The project management and professional services automation (PSA) software market is becoming increasingly crowded.

Traditional packages like Microsoft Project are taking on more enterprise-level management features, while ‘best of breed’ PSA packages are competing for the same enterprise market – and even ERP vendors have built this functionality into their software.

Clearly, the suppliers think this market space is worth fighting for. One reason may be studies from the likes of Aberdeen Group which clearly establish the ROI that can be derived from using software to automate time & expenses, billing and resource management. And Aberdeen’s David Hofferberth is one of the experts we consult on how the market is likely to pan out, in our Round Table article.

Elsewhere, Mike Hesketh examines whether frequent project failures can be traced back to faults in the software being used.

Dennis Howlett finds out what existing users make of their PSA software, while Simon Wallace stratifies the kinds of projects that can be undertaken, and the software that is appropriate for each level of project.


Home > 2002 > Project Management & Professional Services Automation (August) > Summary