Consultants' Advisory Home Page Consultants' Advisory Home Page Reports Archive Register(Free) for the Online or Printed version of Consultants' Advisory

Business & software reviews
visit evaluationcentre.com

The Evaluation Centre's aim is to be the No.1 Software and technology assistant to decision makers with their IT requirements. Providing detailed Vendor reports, White papers, Case studies and Best practice guidelines

   

Home > 2004 > Enterprise Project Management & PSA (May) > Market Direction: Gareth ...

You are not signed in to view the full issue > Sign In

Summary of Reports


 Artemis International

 Epicor Software

 IFS

 SharpOWL

 Tx3 Solutions



Management Briefings



 Market Overview | Part 2 | Part 3

 Round Table: Experts from Aberdeen Group, Ovum, Atos KPMG Consulting and Z/Yen | Part 2 | Part 3

 Benchmarking: Tony Kippenberger from the Centre for Strategic Business Studies | Part 2

 Expert Opinion: Kelvin Kirby of Technology Associates

 Software Capabilities: HKL’s Jonathan Hirons | Part 2

 Case Study: How IT specialist Touchpaper automated its consultancy division | Part 2

 Market Direction: Gareth Lewis of Pserendipity | Part 2

 Project Delivery: Janice Southway at Boxwood | Part 2

 Market News: All the latest news from the UK and global consultancy industry | Part 2

 Annual Consultants' Forum | Part 2

 Industry Report | Part 2

 Vendor Choice: George Elkington of Deloitte

Issue Summary

Gareth Lewis examines whether PSA and project management packages dovetail or conflict with each other.

Complementary or contradictory? - Part 2 | Part 1

The more sophisticated PPM applications allow users to review individual projects against multiple criteria. And although the review tools are usually demonstrated in a way that suggests the aim of the portfolio manager will be to eliminate those projects that offer little reward, or are high-risk or both, in practice the manager is likely to use them to restructure resource allocation.

For example, new and untried resources may initially be allocated to necessary but low-return projects to prove themselves before they are utilised on more critical projects. Again, ‘wild card’ resources may be moved from critical maintenance projects to high-risk, high-return projects where the challenges match their skills.

Read the rest of this article...

If you are not registered with the site, please register now to read the rest of this page.

If you are registered, please sign in to read the rest of this page.


Home > 2004 > Enterprise Project Management & PSA (May) > Market Direction: Gareth ...