Consultants' Advisory Home Page Consultants' Advisory Home Page Reports Archive Register(Free) for the Online or Printed version of Consultants' Advisory

Business & software reviews
visit evaluationcentre.com

The Evaluation Centre's aim is to be the No.1 Software and technology assistant to decision makers with their IT requirements. Providing detailed Vendor reports, White papers, Case studies and Best practice guidelines

   

Home > 2004 > Enterprise Project Management & PSA (May) > Summary

You are not signed in to view the full issue > Sign In

Summary of Reports


 Artemis International

 Epicor Software

 IFS

 SharpOWL

 Tx3 Solutions



Management Briefings



 Market Overview | Part 2 | Part 3

 Round Table: Experts from Aberdeen Group, Ovum, Atos KPMG Consulting and Z/Yen | Part 2 | Part 3

 Benchmarking: Tony Kippenberger from the Centre for Strategic Business Studies | Part 2

 Expert Opinion: Kelvin Kirby of Technology Associates

 Software Capabilities: HKL’s Jonathan Hirons | Part 2

 Case Study: How IT specialist Touchpaper automated its consultancy division | Part 2

 Market Direction: Gareth Lewis of Pserendipity | Part 2

 Project Delivery: Janice Southway at Boxwood | Part 2

 Market News: All the latest news from the UK and global consultancy industry | Part 2

 Annual Consultants' Forum | Part 2

 Industry Report | Part 2

 Vendor Choice: George Elkington of Deloitte

Issue Summary

Enterprise Project Management & PSA

May 2004 - Summary

Enterprise project management and professional services automation (PSA) software is at a crossroads: the market is being supported by the specialist vendors, Microsoft and leading ERP players, all of whom are active in this area.

Yet users still have some concerns about the capabilities and cost of the packages, according to our research findings.

So where will the market go next – on an upwards or downward spiral?

Kelvin Kirby of Technology Associates believes that the extra capabilities of web-based project management packages – in key areas like balanced scorecar analysis and progress tracking – means this software will increasingly be seen as providing benefit to senior executives.

Tony Kippenberger of the Centre for Strategic Business Studies also identifies a specific opportunity for consultants in administering a new way for companies to assess how well they manage projects.

Yet the nagging doubt remains that the overlap/confusion between PM and PSA packages continues to hold the market back. Gareth Lewis looks for a way past that conundrum in his article.


Home > 2004 > Enterprise Project Management & PSA (May) > Summary